In early March, I published an article introducing prophet which
is an open source library released by Facebook that is used to automate the time
series forecasting process. As I promised in that article, I’m going to see how
well those predictions held up to the real world after 2.5 months of traffic on this site.
Before going forward, please review the prior article on prophet. I also encourage
you to review the matplotlib article which is a useful starting point for understanding
how to plot these trends. Without further discussion, let’s dive into the code.
If you wish to follow along, the notebook is posted on github.
First, let’s get our imports setup, plotting configured and the forecast data read
into our DataFrame:
import pandas as pd import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt %matplotlib inline plt.style.use('ggplot') proj = pd.read_excel('https://github.com/chris1610/pbpython/blob/master/data/March-2017-forecast-article.xlsx?raw=True') proj[['ds', 'yhat', 'yhat_lower', 'yhat_upper']].head()
The projected data is stored in the
DataFrame. There are many columns
but we only care about a couple of them:
All of the projections are based on the log scale so we need to convert them back
and filter through May 20th:
proj["Projected_Sessions"] = np.exp(proj.yhat).round() proj["Projected_Sessions_lower"] = np.exp(proj.yhat_lower).round() proj["Projected_Sessions_upper"] = np.exp(proj.yhat_upper).round() final_proj = proj[(proj.ds > "3-5-2017") & (proj.ds < "5-20-2017")][["ds", "Projected_Sessions_lower", "Projected_Sessions", "Projected_Sessions_upper"]]
Next, I’ll read in the actual traffic from March 6th through May 20th and rename
the columns for consistency sake:
actual = pd.read_excel('Traffic_20170306-20170519.xlsx') actual.columns = ["ds", "Actual_Sessions"] actual.head()
Pandas makes combining all of this into a single DataFrame simple:
df = pd.merge(actual, final_proj) df.head()
Evaluating the Results
With the predictions and actuals in a single DataFrame, let’s see how far our projections
were off from actuals by calculating the difference and looking at the basic stats.
df["Session_Delta"] = df.Actual_Sessions - df.Projected_Sessions df.Session_Delta.describe()
count 75.000000 mean 739.440000 std 711.001829 min -1101.000000 25% 377.500000 50% 619.000000 75% 927.000000 max 4584.000000
This gives us a basic idea of the errors but visualizing will be more useful.
Let’s use the process described in the matplotlib article to plot the data.
# Need to convert to just a date in order to keep plot from throwing errors df['ds'] = df['ds'].dt.date fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(9, 6)) df.plot("ds", "Session_Delta", ax=ax) fig.autofmt_xdate(bottom=0.2, rotation=30, ha='right');
This visualization is helpful for understanding the data and highlights a couple
- Most of the variance shows the actual traffic being higher than projected
- There were two big spikes in April which correspond to publish dates for articles
- The majority of the variance was less than 1000
On the surface this may seem a little disappointing. However, we should not look
at the predicted value as much as the predicted range. Prophet gives us the range
and we can use the
function in matplotlib to display the range
around the predicted values:
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(9, 6)) df.plot(kind='line', x='ds', y=['Actual_Sessions', 'Projected_Sessions'], ax=ax, style=['-','--']) ax.fill_between(df['ds'].values, df['Projected_Sessions_lower'], df['Projected_Sessions_upper'], alpha=0.2) ax.set(title='Pbpython Traffic Prediction Accuracy', xlabel='', ylabel='Sessions') fig.autofmt_xdate(bottom=0.2, rotation=30, ha='right'
This view restores some more confidence in our model. It looks like we had a big
over prediction at the beginning of the time frame but did not predict the impact
of the two articles published in the subsequent weeks. More interestingly, the majority
of the traffic was right at the upper end of our projection and the weekly variability
is captured reasonably well.
So, how good was the model? I think a lot depends on what we were hoping for.
In my case, I was not making any multi-million dollar decisions based on the accuracy.
Additionally, I did not have any other models in place so I have nothing to compare
the prediction to. From that perspective, I am happy that I was able to develop
a fairly robust model with only a little effort. Another way to think about this
is that if I were trying to put this model together by hand, I am sure I would
not have come up with a better approach. Additionally, the volume of the views
with the April 25th article is nearly impossible to predict so I don’t worry
about that miss and the subsequent uptick in volume.
Predictive models are rarely a one shot affair. It takes some time to understand
what makes them tick and how to interpret their output. I plan to look at some of
the tuning options to see which parameters I could tweak to improve the accuracy
for my use case.
I hope this is useful and would definitely like to hear what others have found with
prophet or other tools to predict this type of activity. For those of you with experience
predicting website traffic, would this have been a “good” outcome?
Source From: pbpython.com.
Original article title: How Accurately Can Prophet Project Website Traffic?.
This full article can be read at: How Accurately Can Prophet Project Website Traffic?.