David Carlos: Discussion about the future of fedmsg.

Introduction

Because of my work on Google Summer of Code this year, I was invited to attend
to the Fedora Contributor Conference (Flock) as volunteer, helping the
organization staff to record some sessions and writing about what was discussed
on then. This year, the FLock Conference was in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Was
a incredible experience, allowing
me to keep up with great discussions made by the Fedora developers. On this post I
will make a resume of what was discussed
on the session The Future of fedmsg?,
proposed by Jeremy Cline.

The Session

The Fedora infrastructure have several different services that need to
talk to each other. One simple example is the AutoQA service, that listen to
some events triggered by the fedpkg library. If we have only two services
interacting the problem is minimal, but when several
applications request and response to other several applications, the problem
becomes huge. FEDerated MeSsaGe bus (fedmsg), is a python package and
API defining a brokerless messaging architecture to send and receive messages
to and from applications.

fedmsg does not have a broker to manage the publish/subscribe process,
done by the services that interacts with it. This leads to a problem of
performance and reliability, because every service that consumes a message from
fedmsg have to subscribe to every existent topic. Other issue with the absence
of a broker, is that it is common to lose messages, that not always get to the
destination. Jeremy proposed to use a broker (or several brokers) to fix these
issues, and made a demo code showing the benefits of using a broker, instead of
the current architecture of fedmsg.

A great discussion emerged from this demo
code, including the reflection if Fedora really needs that fedmsg be reliable.
Other problem pointed by Jeremy was the documentation of fedmsg, and the
existent tools to consume and publish messages (fedmsg-hub have a setup that
is quite confuse). This was my review of the session, and based on my work on
Google Summer of Code (I had used fedmsg to consume the Anitya events), I
agree with Jeremy. Adding a broker to manage the publish/subscribe process, could
improve the consume of resources of fedmsg, would facilitate to add new services
consuming messages from the API and would make fedmsg more reliable.


Source From: fedoraplanet.org.
Original article title: David Carlos: Discussion about the future of fedmsg..
This full article can be read at: David Carlos: Discussion about the future of fedmsg..

Advertisement


Random Article You May Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*